Welcome
Welcome to SuiJurisForum.com --- You are currently viewing our boards as a guest. Members of this FREE Community are able to gain access to write capabilities, private messaging, a chat room, extra forums, and more!

***If you decide to Join our FREE Community... then DON'T FORGET to PASS/SKIP the multiple ADVERTISEMENTS during Registration that ask for Phone Numbers!! ***

IMPEACHMENT!!! dream-on.

Discuss about the world and people freedom as entire.

Re: IMPEACHMENT!!! dream-on.

Postby BOBT12 » Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:03 pm

This is about right.

fedup58 wrote:Impeachments for this punk is not enough. Obama is a fraud. He released a forgery about his birth certificate. This release of a forgery by the white house is a crime. Obama should truly be walked out of the white house and put in a super max prison. He doesn’t deserve to sit as president for one more day. Where are you Darell Issa????????????? Get this idiot out of the white house. It is your job.
"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual."-- Thomas Jefferson

”The principles contained in the Declaration of Independence are saving principles. Stand by those principles; be true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost.” –Frederick Douglass.

"The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun."- Patrick Henry

"Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God."- William Penn;Thomas Jefferson's personal seal, attributed to the judges who executed King Charles I for crimes against the people.

inforwars.com

BOBT12 has been thanked by:
User avatar
BOBT12
Sovereign Dei Gratia
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 10:34 pm
Has thanked: 426 time
Have thanks: 160 time

 

Re: IMPEACHMENT!!! dream-on.

Postby BOBT12 » Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:08 pm

Here is a little feedback on the Obama Impeachment.

Thank you for contacting me about the authority of the president to commit U.S. military forces to combat. I appreciate hearing from you.

As you know, Representative Walter Jones (R-NC) introduced a resolution (H. Con. Res. 107) in the House of Representatives on March 7, 2012 which would express a sense of Congress that should President Obama, or any other president, initiate the use of offensive military force without prior and clear authorization through an Act of Congress, the action would constitute an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under Article II, Section IV of the Constitution. I understand your concerns and value your input about the issues underlying H. Con. Res. 107. Please be assured that I will keep your views about this legislation in mind should related legislation come before the Senate for consideration.

Thank you again for your correspondence. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future if I can be of assistance.

Sincerely,

Signature

Pat Toomey
U.S. Senator, Pennsylvania


Let's keep up the pressure on this matter.
"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual."-- Thomas Jefferson

”The principles contained in the Declaration of Independence are saving principles. Stand by those principles; be true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost.” –Frederick Douglass.

"The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun."- Patrick Henry

"Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God."- William Penn;Thomas Jefferson's personal seal, attributed to the judges who executed King Charles I for crimes against the people.

inforwars.com
User avatar
BOBT12
Sovereign Dei Gratia
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 10:34 pm
Has thanked: 426 time
Have thanks: 160 time

Re: IMPEACHMENT!!! dream-on.

Postby Steve_Lujack » Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:43 pm

March 28, 2012
For More Information Contact: MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY through www.MontgomeryBlairSibley.com
POTUS WRITE-IN CANDIDATE SIBLEY FORCE S SUPREME COURT TO RULE ON OBAMA’SELIGIBILITY TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WASHINGTON D.C. - POTUS Write-In Candidate Montgomery Blair Sibley today filed his Petition for Certiorari with the United States Supreme Court. That Petition presents the Supreme Court with record evidence that: (i) Barack Hussein Obama, II, is not a “natural born Citizen” as required by Article II, §1 of the Constitution and thus is ineligible to be President and (ii) that the “Certificates of Live Birth” released by Mr. Obama are in fact forgeries. Additionally, Sibley is filing a Motion to Expedite Consideration of Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. By these documents, Sibley is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to expedite the resolution of his Quo Warranto lawsuit pending in U.S. District Court before the Honorable John D. Bates. Significantly, though eighty-five (85) days have passed since Sibley’s filing of the lawsuit on January 3, 2012, Judge Bates has refused to rule upon any of the pending matters in that suit. Sibley’s filings procedurally forces the Supreme Court to declare whether they will take up the question of Obama’s eligibility to be President or allow the question to be relegated to a judicial process that would not reach the Supreme Court until well after the November 6, 2012, election, let alone before the September 3, 2012, Democratic Convention. Sibley stated: “Obama’s eligibility to be President is now in the hands of the Supreme Court. I have properly invoked the federal statute which authorizes challenges to the eligibility of federal office holders and procedurally have now moved that question from the District Court through the Circuit Court of Appeals and now, with these filings, to the Supreme Court. If they deny my Petition to expedite resolution of the significant and fairly-posed question of Obama’s eligibility, it is a clear statement that they will refuse to allow that matter to be properly and promptly adjudicated. In that case, I fear “We the People” will have lost “the right, possessed by every citizen, to require that the Government be administered according to law.”1 For if the Supreme Court will not take up the issue of whether the Government is being administered according to the rule of law, then the government is clearly being administered instead by the rule of whim and caprice.” Sibley concluded: “Thus I call upon the Supreme Court to forthwith resolve this heretofore unresolved question: Is Barack Hussein Obama, II, eligible to be President of the United States?”- E n d - 1

Fairchild v. Hughes, 258 U.S. 126, 130 (1922)


U.S. Supreme Court
FAIRCHILD v. HUGHES, 258 U.S. 126 (1922)
258 U.S. 126
FAIRCHILD
v
HUGHES, Secretary of State, et al.

Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.
On July 7, 1920, Charles S. Fairchild, of New York, brought this suit in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia against the Secretary of State and the Attorney General. The prayers of the bill are that 'the so- called Suffrage Amendment [the Nineteenth to the federal Constitution] be declared unconstitutional and void'; that the Secretary of State be restrained from issuing any proclamation declaring that it has been ratified; and that the Attorney General be restrained from enforcing it. There is also a prayer for general relief and for an interlocutory injunction. The plaintiff, and others on whose behalf he sues, are citizens of the United States, taxpayers and members of the American Constitutional League, a voluntary association which describes itself as engaged in diffusing 'knowledge as to the fundamental principles of the American Constitution, and especially that which gives to each state the right to determine for itself the question as to who should exercise the elective franchise therein.'
The claim to relief was rested upon the following allegations: The Legislatures of 34 of the states have passed resolutions purporting to ratify the Suffrage Amendment; and from one other state the Secretary of State of the United States has received a certificate to that effect purporting to come from the proper officer. The proposed amendment cannot, for reasons stated, be made a part of the Constitution through ratification by the Legislatures, and there are also specific reasons why the resolutions already adopted in several of the states are inoperative. But the Secretary has declared that he is [258 U.S. 126, 128] without power to examine into the validity of alleged acts of ratification, and that, upon receiving from one additional state the customary certificate, he will issue a proclamation declaring that the Suffrage Amendment has been adopted. Furthermore, 'a force bill' has been introduced in the Senate, which provides fine and imprisonment for any person who refuses to allow women to vote, and, if the bill is enacted, the Attorney General will be required to enforce its provisions. The threatened proclamation of the adoption of the amendment would not be conclusive of its validity, but it would lead election officers to permit women to vote in states whose Constitutions limit suffrage to men. This would prevent ascertainment of the wishes of the legally qualified voters, and elections, state and federal, would be void. Free citizens would be deprived of their right to have such elections duly held, the effectiveness of their votes would be diminished, and election expenses would be nearly doubled. Thus irremediable mischief would result.
The Supreme Court of the District granted a rule to show cause why an interlocutory injunction should not issue. The return was promptly made, and the defendants also moved to dismiss the bill. On July 14, 1920, the rule was discharged, a decree was entered dismissing the bill, and an appeal was taken to the Court of Appeals of the District. The Secretary, having soon thereafter received a certificate of ratification from the thirty-sixth state, proclaimed, on August 26, 1920, the adoption of the Nineteenth Amendment. The defendants then moved to dismiss or affirm. The Court of Appeals affirmed the decree, on the authority of United States v. Colby, 49 App. D. C. 358, 265 Fed. 998, where it had refused to compel the Secretary to cancel the proclamation declaring that the Eighteenth Amendment had been adopted. The grounds of that decision were that the validity of the amendment could be in no way affected by an order [258 U.S. 126, 129] of cancellation; that it depended on the ratifications by the states, and not on the proclamation; and that the proclamation was unimpeachable, since the Secretary was required, under Revised Statutes, 205 (Comp. St . 303), to issue the proclamation upon receiving from three-fourths of the states official notice of ratification, and had no power to determine whether or not the notices received stated the truth. But we have no occasion to consider these grounds of decision.
Plaintiff's alleged interest in the question submitted is not such as to afford a basis for this proceeding. It is frankly a proceeding to have the Nineteenth Amendment declared void. In form it is a bill in equity; but it is not a case, within the meaning of section 2 of article 3 of the Constitution, which confers judicial power on the federal courts, for no claim of plaintiff is 'brought before the court[s] for determination by such regular proceedings as are established by law or custom for the protection or enforcement of rights, or the prevention, redress, or punishment of wrongs.' See In re Pacific Railway Commission (C. C.) 32 Fed. 241, 255, quoted in Muskrat v. United States, 219 U.S. 346, 357 , 31 S. Sup. Ct. 250. The alleged wrongful act of the Secretary of State, said to be threatening, is the issuing of a proclamation which plaintiff asserts will be vain, but will mislead election officers. The alleged wrongful act of the Attorney General, said to be threatening, is the enforcement, as against election officers, of the penalties to be imposed by a contemplated act of Congress which plaintiff asserts would be unconstitutional. But plaintiff is not an election officer; and the state of New York, of which he is a citizen, had previously amended its own Constitution so as to grant the suffrage to women, and had ratified this amendment. Plaintiff has only the right, possessed by every citizen, to require that the government be administered according to law and that the public moneys be not wasted. Obviously this general right does not entitle a private citizen to institute in the [258 U.S. 126, 130] federal courts a suit to secure by indirection a determination whether a statute, if passed, or a constitutional amendment, about to be adopted, will be valid. Compare Giles v. Harris, 189 U.S. 475 , 23 Sup. Ct. 639; Tyler v. Judges of Court of Registration, 179 U.S. 405 , 21 Sup. Ct. 206.
Decree affirmed.
User avatar
Steve_Lujack
Sovereign Dei Gratia
 
Posts: 3189
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:59 pm
Location: Florida
Has thanked: 646 time
Have thanks: 226 time

Re: IMPEACHMENT!!! dream-on.

Postby BOBT12 » Fri Apr 06, 2012 6:42 pm

Just in case anyone missed this, it's time to get rid of the bum.

The Case for Impeachment (Special Report)

By Steven Baldwin

Product Description

The Founding Fathers enshrined the impeachment clause into the United States Constitution because they feared that a president intent on subverting the very principles the American experiment was built on would someday rise to power.

Despite all the checks and balances and obstacles they put in place, the Founders knew a determined cabal could still gain control of all three branches of government and wield this consolidation of power to dismantle our cherished Constitutional principles, and eradicate the freedoms that generations of Americans sacrificed their lives to preserve.

MAKE NO MISTAKE: THAT DAY IS NOW UPON US.

"The Case For Impeachment" is an insightful summary of how President Barack Hussein Obama’s purposeful actions have jeopardized America’s ability to defend herself, and undermined our free enterprise system, corrupted our democratic institutions, and transferred massive amounts of power and wealth from American citizens to extremist special interest groups whose loyalty lies not with our Constitution, but with a global socialist movement. This is the beginning of the end for the United States unless the people exercise their precious remaining liberties and stand and demand that their elected representatives impeach this president before further mortal damage is inflicted upon America.

If the silent majority can summon the indignation, willpower and energy to make their voices heard, there is still a chance our country may survive.
Emphasis added.
Attachments
OathKeepers2.jpg
OathKeepers2.jpg (3.59 KiB) Viewed 1742 times
obama_hitler1.jpg
Obama Impeachment_KP275.jpg
Obama Impeachment_KP275.jpg (14.28 KiB) Viewed 1742 times
"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual."-- Thomas Jefferson

”The principles contained in the Declaration of Independence are saving principles. Stand by those principles; be true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost.” –Frederick Douglass.

"The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun."- Patrick Henry

"Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God."- William Penn;Thomas Jefferson's personal seal, attributed to the judges who executed King Charles I for crimes against the people.

inforwars.com
User avatar
BOBT12
Sovereign Dei Gratia
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 10:34 pm
Has thanked: 426 time
Have thanks: 160 time

Re: IMPEACHMENT!!! dream-on.

Postby BOBT12 » Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:35 pm

Attachments
obama=jail.jpg
obama=jail.jpg (16.74 KiB) Viewed 1726 times
Obama_impeach-obama.jpg
Obama_impeach-obama.jpg (47.26 KiB) Viewed 1726 times
Obama_ElusiveFactCheck.jpg
Obama_ElusiveFactCheck.jpg (24.04 KiB) Viewed 1726 times
"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual."-- Thomas Jefferson

”The principles contained in the Declaration of Independence are saving principles. Stand by those principles; be true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost.” –Frederick Douglass.

"The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun."- Patrick Henry

"Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God."- William Penn;Thomas Jefferson's personal seal, attributed to the judges who executed King Charles I for crimes against the people.

inforwars.com
User avatar
BOBT12
Sovereign Dei Gratia
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 10:34 pm
Has thanked: 426 time
Have thanks: 160 time

Re: IMPEACHMENT!!! dream-on.

Postby lostandfound » Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:04 pm

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. The truth has been kept from the depth of their minds by masters who rule them with lies. They feed them on falsehoods till wrongs look like right in their eyes." ~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face, forever.

lostandfound has been thanked by:
User avatar
lostandfound
King of my Own Domain
 
Posts: 2138
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 2:40 am
Location: Out peering in
Has thanked: 303 time
Have thanks: 184 time

Re: IMPEACHMENT!!! dream-on.

Postby BOBT12 » Sat Apr 14, 2012 9:54 pm

Impeachment growing strong.


There always have been those few who have launched diatribes over the dictatorial actions of any given U.S. presidential administration, over civil rights, foreign affairs, the economy, the draft or a dozen other topics – even though the Constitution was written specifically to prevent the collection of too much power by one branch of government.

Now, again, there are words like “egocentric megalomaniac” being ascribed to the White House, and warnings about detention camps and government surveillance of its citizens.





But where previous generations of warnings emanated from lone wolves with their fax machines in dusty spare rooms, the current alarms are being issued by the likes of Investors Business Daily, First Amendment authority Nat Hentoff, New York Times best-selling author Robert Ringer and their equals.

“A second term free of electoral restraints [for Obama] may be a frightening prospect,” IBD wrote in a commentary in the last week. “This is, after all, a president who has said he can’t wait for Congress to act and will govern by executive order and regulations if necessary. He has questioned the Supreme Court’s ‘unprecedented’ review of Obamacare.”

The publication pointed out that the Obama administration already is in contempt of court – in a court dispute over its ban on oil drilling rigs in the Gulf of Mexico.

When U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman ruled that the Obama Interior Department unconstitutionally imposed an offshore drilling moratorium, the agency “simply established a second ban that was virtually identical.”

“Judge Feldman was not amused. ‘Each step the government took following the court’s imposition of a preliminary injunction showcases its defiance,’ Feldman said in his ruling. ‘Such dismissive conduct, viewed in tandem with the re-imposition of a second moratorium …. provides this court with clear and convincing evidence of its contempt,’” the editorial

http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/alarms-over- ... n-surging/
"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual."-- Thomas Jefferson

”The principles contained in the Declaration of Independence are saving principles. Stand by those principles; be true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost.” –Frederick Douglass.

"The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun."- Patrick Henry

"Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God."- William Penn;Thomas Jefferson's personal seal, attributed to the judges who executed King Charles I for crimes against the people.

inforwars.com
User avatar
BOBT12
Sovereign Dei Gratia
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 10:34 pm
Has thanked: 426 time
Have thanks: 160 time

Re: IMPEACHMENT!!! dream-on.

Postby grndslm » Sat Sep 28, 2013 3:29 pm

http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/2013/09 ... sts-12423/
President Barack Obama’s Comprehensive List of Historic Firsts

By: Dan Asmussen, TLB Contributor.

• First President to preside over a cut to the credit rating of the United States government

• First President to violate Article 1 Section 9 of the Constitution by sitting as Chairman of the UN Security Counsel (a foreign post)

• First President to violate the Logan Act by sending his Secretary of Defense to attend the Bilderberg meeting

• First President to orchestrate the sale of murder weapons to Mexican drug cartels

• First President to issue unlawful “Recess-Appointments” over a long weekend — while the U.S. Senate remained in session (against the advice of his own Justice Department)

• First President to be Held in Contempt of Court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico

• First president to intentionally disable credit card security measures in order to allow over-the-limit donations, foreign contributions and other illegal fund-raising measures.

• First President to defy a Federal Judge’s court order to cease implementing the ‘Health Care Reform’ Law

• First President to halt deportations of illegal aliens and grant them work permits, a form of stealth amnesty roughly equivalent to “The DREAM Act”, which could not pass Congress

• First President to sign a law requiring all Americans to purchase a product from a third party

• First President to spend a Trillion dollars on ‘Shovel-Ready’ jobs — and later admit there was no such thing as Shovel-Ready jobs

• First President to sue states for requiring valid IDs to vote, even though the same administration requires valid IDs to travel by air

• First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters

• First President to sign into law a bill that permits the government to “hold anyone suspected of being associated with terrorism indefinitely, without any form of due process. No indictment. No judge or jury. No evidence. No trial. Just an indefinite jail sentence.”

• First President to bypass Congress and implement the DREAM Act through Executive Fiat

• First President to threaten insurance companies after they publicly spoke out on how Obamacare helped cause their rate increases

• First President to openly defy a Congressional Order not to share sensitive nuclear defense secrets with the Russian Government

• First President to threaten an auto company (Ford) after it publicly mocked bailouts of GM and Chrysler

• First President to terminate America’s ability to put a man into space

• First President to encourage racial discrimination and intimidation at polling places

• First President to have a law signed by an ‘Auto-pen’ without being “Present”

• First President to send $200 million to a terrorist organization (Hamas) after Congress had explicitly frozen the money for fear it would fund attacks against civilians

• First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it (Defense of Marriage Act)

• First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which State they are allowed to locate a factory

• First President to file lawsuits against the States he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN, etc.)

• First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago

• First President to fire an Inspector General of Americorps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case

• First President to propose an Executive Order demanding companies disclose their political contributions to bid on government contracts

• First President to preside over America’s loss of its status as the world’s largest economy

• First President to allow Mexican police to conduct law enforcement activities on American soil

• First president to propose budgets so unreasonable that not a single representative from either party would cast a vote in favor (“Senate unanimously rejected President Obama’s budget last year in 0-97 vote”, Politico, “House Votes 414-0 to Reject Obama’s Budget Plan”)

• First President to play golf 90 or more times in his first three years in office

• First President to authorize the use of surveillance/attack drones on American citizens

• First President to authorize the use of deadly force against American citizens with no proof of wrongdoing, no criminal evidence, and no due process

• First President to violate the War Powers Act (Unilaterally executing American military operations in Libya without informing Congress in the required time period)

• First President to triple the number of warrant-less wiretaps of U.S. Citizens

• First President to refuse to tell the public what he did for eight (8) hours after being informed that a U.S. Ambassador was facing imminent death during a terror attack

• First President to lie about the reason for an Ambassador’s death, blaming it on an Internet Video rather than what he knew to be the case: the Al Qaeda-linked Terror Group Ansar al-Sharia

• First President to have an innocent filmmaker thrown in jail after lying about the cause for a deadly attack on U.S. Diplomats, using the filmmaker as a scapegoat

• First President to use the IRS to “Unfairly Target Political Enemies” as well as Jewish groups

• First President to unlawfully seize telephone records of more than 100 reporters to intimidate and/or bully them

• First President to witness a single cabinet Secretary commit multiple Hatch Act violations without acting, speaking out, disciplining or firing that person

• First President to have his Attorney General held in criminal contempt of Congress for his efforts to cover up Operation Fast and Furious, that killed over 300 individuals

• First President to claim Executive Privilege to shield a sitting Attorney General from a Contempt of Congress finding for perjury and withholding evidence from lawful subpoenas

• First President to sue States for enforcing voter ID requirements, which were previously ruled legal by the U.S. Supreme Court

• First President to increase surveillance of American Citizens under the Patriot Act by 1,000 percent in four years

• First President to demand a company hand over $20 Billion to one of his political appointees (BP Oil Spill Relief Fund)

• First President to publicly announce an enemies list (consisting of his opponents campaign contributors; and to use the instrumentality of government to punish those on the list)

• First President to attempt to block legally-required 60-day layoff notices by Government contractors due to his own cuts to defense spending — because the notices would occur before the election

• First President to send 80 percent of a $16 billion program (green energy) to his campaign bundlers and contributors, leaving only 20% to those who did not contribute

• First President to issue an Executive Order implementing a “Racial Justice System”, a system that tries to achieve “racially equivalent outcomes” for crimes

• First President to leak confidential IRS tax records to groups aligned politically with him for partisan advantage

• First President to use the EPA to punish political enemies and reward political allies

• First President to send millions in taxpayer dollars to his wife’s former employer

• First President to have his administration fund an organization tied to the cop-killing terrorist group, the Weather Underground

• First President to move America past the dependency tipping point, in which 51% of households now pay no income taxes

• First President to increase Food Stamp spending by more than 100% in less than four years

• First President whose economic policies have the number of Americans on disability exceed the population of New York

• First President to sue states for enforcing immigration laws passed by Congress

• First President to redistribute $26.5 billion of the taxpayers’ funds to his union supporters in the UAW

• First President to endanger the stability of the electric grid by shutting down hundreds of Coal-Fired plants without adequate replacement technologies

• First President to have his EPA repudiated by a Federal Judge for “Overstepping Its Powers” when they attempted to shut down coal operations in Appalachia

• First President to lie repeatedly to the American people about the murder of a U.S. Ambassador and three other diplomatic personnel for purely political reasons, rewriting a “Talking Points” Memo no fewer than a dozen times to avoid referencing a pre-planned terror attack

• First President to Leak Highly Classified Military and Intelligence Secrets to Hollywood In Order to Promote a Movie That Could Help His Reelection Campaign

• First President to Insert Himself into White House biographies of past Presidents

• First President to Golf 122 or More Times in His First Four-and-a-half Years in Office

• First President to be born in a foreign country (Kenya)

• First President to fraudulently obtain and use the social security number of a dead person

• First President to add more to the National Debt than ALL the previous President’s before him


I know that the last one's not true, because GWB added 9 Trillion within 1 year. Only thing is that theoretically the financial industry should have paid the American government back for that. But I think what's happening is that the Fed is printing the money and giving it to the banks to pay back. I really have no fucking clue why the dollar hasn't completely crashed yet.
A lawyer cannot claim that you have rights. -- U.S. v. Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538

"When Tyranny becomes Law, Rebellion becomes Duty." -- Someone from the Confederacy, circa 1860
User avatar
grndslm
Out of the State
 
Posts: 2747
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 10:55 pm
Location: A Rebel Fort
Has thanked: 374 time
Have thanks: 199 time

Re: IMPEACHMENT!!! dream-on.

Postby quasimodo » Sat Sep 28, 2013 8:53 pm

I must be missing something here, do we still have a constitution?
quasimodo
Creditor In Commerce
 
Posts: 1718
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 12:12 pm
Location: Austin township, Republic of Texas
Has thanked: 115 time
Have thanks: 199 time

Re: IMPEACHMENT!!! dream-on.

Postby Brick Layer » Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:57 pm

User avatar
Brick Layer
Freeman
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 3:46 pm
Location: Michigan
Has thanked: 17 time
Have thanks: 29 time

PreviousNext

Return to End of America

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron
suspicion-preferred