Welcome to SuiJurisForum.com --- You are currently viewing our boards as a guest. Members of this FREE Community are able to gain access to write capabilities, private messaging, a chat room, extra forums, and more!

***If you decide to Join our FREE Community... then DON'T FORGET to PASS/SKIP the multiple ADVERTISEMENTS during Registration that ask for Phone Numbers!! ***

Employers Create Fictional 'Persons'

Discuss anything about life situation.

Employers Create Fictional 'Persons'

Postby palani » Fri Aug 08, 2014 8:39 am

Now if the legal system can do it then why can't your employer do it? I wonder if all these newly created fictional 'persons' had all the required documents to work in the U.S. or are they classed 'illegal aliens'?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/0 ... lp00000592

A former Subway sandwich maker in Washington claims his employer used an inventive scheme to avoid paying him overtime: Creating fictional workers.

Erwin Zambrano Moya alleges in a lawsuit filed in federal court Wednesday that the Subway franchise at 2301 Georgia Ave. NW, near Howard University, systematically shortchanged him for the two years ending in June. According to the complaint, the owner accomplished this, in part, by paying Moya as if he were multiple workers, thereby keeping the real Moya under 40 hours each week.

Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, most hourly workers like Moya are entitled to time-and-a-half pay for any hours worked over 40 per week. Moya says he worked 70 hours per week on average, but was paid in "straight time," thanks to the multiple paychecks.

"To hide Plaintiff's very high number of hours worked per week, Defendant regularly paid Plaintiff about half of his wages under his name and about half under a fictional employee name, typically, Ever Ventura," the complaint states.

It goes on, "Sometimes during Plaintiff's employ, Defendant took it one step further to attempt to hide [minimum wage and overtime] violations by paying Plaintiff under the payroll of another Subway owned by Defendant or its agents or owners."

In addition, Moya claims he was paid at just $7.25 per hour, less than the $8.25 minimum wage in effect in D.C. during his tenure. He also says he wasn't paid at all for a 45-hour period shortly before his employment at Subway came to an end.

The franchise operator, identified in the complaint as Parvin Feroz, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

It isn't unheard of for low-wage businesses to be accused of splitting paychecks to dodge overtime rules. Last June, workers at a McDonald's in the Ronald Reagan Building in downtown Washington alleged in a complaint filed with the Labor Department that a franchisee forced them to accept pay through two separate checks. Some of those employees said they worked more than 80 hours per week.

Moya's suit is a proposed class action against the franchise. According to the complaint, more than a dozen workers were employed at the shop while Moya was there and "were paid in the same manner and under the same standard employment procedures."

Subway, which could not be reached for comment late Thursday, was not named in the lawsuit.
Make me one with everything.
-- Zen Master to the hot dog vendor
Out of Commerce
Posts: 5793
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:46 am
Has thanked: 167 time
Have thanks: 478 time


Return to Living and Survival

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests