||Welcome to SuiJurisForum.com --- You are currently viewing our boards as a guest. Members of this FREE Community are able to gain access to write capabilities, private messaging, a chat room, extra forums, and more!
***If you decide to Join our FREE Community... then DON'T FORGET to PASS/SKIP the multiple ADVERTISEMENTS during Registration that ask for Phone Numbers!! ***
country_hick wrote:Judges are unaccountable pricks. They can apply the law one way today, another way tomorrow, and ignore the law completely on Wednesdays if they feel it to be necessary.
Shoonra wrote:to bring into a current case the distinctions that used to exist will only baffle and annoy the CHANCELLOR.
amk wrote:Its time to put up (hard evidence) or shut up.
[/quote]I have evidence of my win.
I don't really want my full name, and DOB published for all to see.
No I won't show you, but I am willing to show a few on here whom I don't mind having my information and that can confirm or deny it if you want.
I have no idea of what you are speaking about. What does it mean to have "Jesus" pay the fine? You provide no support for this nonsense, whatsoever! You could go to a thread and discuss any issue that interest you, instead you make broad and baseless statements about what you think is going on. If you keep up this sort of groundless behavior, there may be action taken to limit your recklessness. You have been informally (since you are new) warned! Find what issue you wish to discuss, and discuss them on that thread, feel free to support your views. Due to your broad and unwarranted statements this thread will be locked.amk wrote:This is a criticism of all those posters who claim to have the remedy (for everything). You are all charlatans and fools. From the guy who says accept for value and have Jesus pay the fine to the freemen driving without a licence (should that be "not driving") and their own plates, you are all frauds!
Emphasis added. As a member you are considered to have read and agreed to the rules.*DISCLAIMER for HYPERTEXT LINKS * Neither the owner of Sui Juris Club Forum nor its contributors is responsible for the contents of any off-site pages referenced. The user specifically acknowledges that neither the owner of Sui Juris Club Forum nor its contributors is liable for the defamatory, offensive, or illegal conduct of other users, links, or third parties and that the risk of injury from the foregoing rests entirely with the user. Links from Sui Juris Club Forum on the World Wide Web to other sites do not constitute an endorsement from the owner of Sui Juris Club Forum. These links are provided as an information service only. It is the responsibility to the web surfer to evaluate the content and usefulness of information obtained from other sites.
*VERACITY OF INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN* Anything found on this site is considered to be news stories, history, idea, conjecture and personal opinion. None of the information contained herein is considered the last or final word on anything to do with any topic what so ever. Seek professional opinion and counseling from qualified individuals before attempting any action herein described, adopting any of these opinions as your own, or taking any other action whatsoever. All statements made on this Website are to be considered opinion only and not necessarily informed opinion. All opinions expressed on this Website are generally to the best of our knowledge, however, all options should be discussed with persons who have professional training [or you can be, and act, Sui Juris] with the subjects covered herein.
* ALL POSSIBLE DISCLAIMERS APPLY! *RIGHT TO DELETE AND REMOVE* The Website Team retains the right to edit or remove any or all information from any user or past or present member of the team, player administrator, submitter, or entity and information that they wish to without any notice of any kind before or after the event.
amk wrote:Wow. You said it all. YOU are the reason things are the way they are now. YOU are the reason liberty has been lost. What a selfish individual you are! You are also a fool! If you think you will change the system on your own keep your information to yourself and good luck to you. But of course you will not.
amk wrote:Your excuse is as thin as I imagine your remedy is.
Are you telling me you are too stupid to redact your own name and date of birth from a document?
amk wrote:If the document is on the public record it is already out there so it is not private anyway. If you don't want people on this site to link the document to your account create a second account and use it to post the document.
amk wrote:A good con man always has a reason why he can't provide evidence. A bad con man has a reason as poor as yours.
Your offer to show others on this site as proof reminds me of the "boiler room" operations in effect in the late 90's and early 00's. I would get calls from brokers for bluesky investments and was offered the opportunity to call the CEO direct. I laughed so hard. "Is the CEO you using a funny voice or your mate sitting next to you" I asked the caller.
You must imagine me to be a moron. Using your logic I could get anyone else on this site to confirm my method and you would be satisfied. Excellent. I will create several other accounts and confirm the legitimacy of my own documents from these other accounts.
Seriously your scam isn't even a good one.
If you are legitimate I challenge you to post the document with your DOB and surname redacted. Otherwise your just another problem masquerading as a solution.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests