Welcome
Welcome to SuiJurisForum.com --- You are currently viewing our boards as a guest. Members of this FREE Community are able to gain access to write capabilities, private messaging, a chat room, extra forums, and more!

***If you decide to Join our FREE Community... then DON'T FORGET to PASS/SKIP the multiple ADVERTISEMENTS during Registration that ask for Phone Numbers!! ***

The Queen may drive without a driver license

Discuss right to travel in the world and Public highway.

The Queen may drive without a driver license

Postby Jethro! » Fri May 19, 2017 12:38 pm

Came across this video intending to be a nice little story about Queen Elizabeth II driving herself home from church. But there's a very interesting bit starting at about :28 -- "The Queen is the only person in the U.K. who is not required to hold a driving license."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmUJsSE_lq4


Why is she the only person in the U.K. who may "drive" without a license? Because she is the sovereign (and everyone else is a subject). This little factoid is a very candid admission about the nature of the driver license and licensing in general... Licensing is about a sovereign exercising that sovereignty over a subject. Makes sense in the U.K. where there is only one sovereign. However, in the U.S. of A. the People are "sovereigns (plural) without subjects" (Chisholm v. Georgia), so how can a license be required of a sovereign? Answer: They can't… unless some "privilege" is involved whereby that sovereign thereby becomes a "subject" (for that purpose).

A great little gem in this video!
Jethro!
Sui Juris Freeman
 
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 5:23 pm
Has thanked: 226 time
Have thanks: 200 time

 

Re: The Queen may drive without a driver license

Postby Nunya_Bizness » Fri May 19, 2017 2:09 pm

Jethro! wrote:Came across this video intending to be a nice little story about Queen Elizabeth II driving herself home from church. But there's a very interesting bit starting at about :28 -- "The Queen is the only person in the U.K. who is not required to hold a driving license."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmUJsSE_lq4


Why is she the only person in the U.K. who may "drive" without a license? Because she is the sovereign (and everyone else is a subject). This little factoid is a very candid admission about the nature of the driver license and licensing in general... Licensing is about a sovereign exercising that sovereignty over a subject. Makes sense in the U.K. where there is only one sovereign. However, in the U.S. of A. the People are "sovereigns (plural) without subjects" (Chisholm v. Georgia), so how can a license be required of a sovereign? Answer: They can't… unless some "privilege" is involved whereby that sovereign thereby becomes a "subject" (for that purpose).

A great little gem in this video!

The "subject" as you have eluded to here in the "U.S. ofA." is called a citizen, and one becomes a citizen by claiming the personhood. as is very clearly discussed in the document "Not a Person Me Smith SOC.PDF
http://bindingthefirm.myfastforum.org/d ... php?id=114
It is a matter of "Voluntary servitude"
And not knowing your relationship to the government United States. And weather you are under their Territorial Jurisdiction..

Involuntary servitude was abolished with their 13th amendment, what they need you to do is volunteer into servitude.
Last edited by Nunya_Bizness on Fri May 19, 2017 2:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Apistevist
noun
- a person (not a legal person)who does not use faith to know things, especially in the religious sense
The burden of proof lies(Prevarication) on religion.
Theism:
"The belief that logic and the brain deducing the logic is not flawed to the point that one can come to the conclusion/belief that god(s) exists." -Nunya_Biziness
Definition of God = The total sum of human ignorance.
If you propose the existence of something, you must follow the scientific method in your defense of it’s existence, otherwise, I have no reason to listen to you.
*Faith* The excuse people give for believing something without good reason.>> *Faith, The grownup word for pretend. "Faith is believing what you know ain't so." — Mark Twain.
Not a person
http://bindingthefirm.myfastforum.org/d ... b3c912fb94
User avatar
Nunya_Bizness
Freeman
 
Posts: 747
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:53 pm
Has thanked: 132 time
Have thanks: 58 time

Re: The Queen may drive without a driver license

Postby palani » Fri May 19, 2017 2:11 pm

In the U.S. a postman needs no drivers license.
Make me one with everything.
-- Zen Master to the hot dog vendor
palani
Out of Commerce
 
Posts: 5793
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:46 am
Has thanked: 167 time
Have thanks: 478 time

Re: The Queen may drive without a driver license

Postby Nunya_Bizness » Fri May 19, 2017 2:24 pm

palani wrote:In the U.S. a postman needs no drivers license.

State of California
Vehicle Code - VEH
DIVISION 6. DRIVERS' LICENSES [12500 - 15325] ( Heading of Division 6 amended by Stats. 1961, Ch. 1615. )

CHAPTER 1. Issuance of Licenses, Expiration, and Renewal [12500 - 13008] ( Chapter 1 enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3. )


ARTICLE 1. Persons Required to Be Licensed, Exemptions, and Age Limits [12500 - 12527] ( Chapter 1 enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3. )

12501.

The following persons are not required to obtain a driver’s license:

(a) An officer or employee of the United States, while operating a motor vehicle owned or controlled by the United States on the business of the United States, except when the motor vehicle being operated is a commercial motor vehicle, as defined in Section 15210.

(b) Any person while driving or operating implements of husbandry incidentally operated or moved over a highway, except as provided in Section 36300 or 36305.

(c) Any person driving or operating an off-highway motor vehicle subject to identification, as defined in Section 38012, while driving or operating such motor vehicle as provided in Section 38025. Nothing in this subdivision authorizes operation of a motor vehicle by a person without a valid driver’s license upon any offstreet parking facility, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 12500.
(Chapter 1 enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
[Emphasis added] This is discussed in the "Not a Person Me Smith SOC.PDF" document


State of California
Vehicle Code - VEH
DIVISION 6. DRIVERS' LICENSES [12500 - 15325] ( Heading of Division 6 amended by Stats. 1961, Ch. 1615. )

CHAPTER 7. Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Program [15200 - 15325] ( Chapter 7 added by Stats. 1988, Ch. 1509, Sec. 9. )

ARTICLE 2. Definitions [15210- 15210.] ( Article 2 added by Stats. 1988, Ch. 1509, Sec. 9. )

15210.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this code, as used in this chapter, the following terms have the following meanings:
(b) (1) “Commercial motor vehicle” means any vehicle or combination of vehicles that requires a class A or class B license, or a class C license with an endorsement issued pursuant to paragraph (2), (3), (4), or (5) of subdivision (a) of Section 15278.
Apistevist
noun
- a person (not a legal person)who does not use faith to know things, especially in the religious sense
The burden of proof lies(Prevarication) on religion.
Theism:
"The belief that logic and the brain deducing the logic is not flawed to the point that one can come to the conclusion/belief that god(s) exists." -Nunya_Biziness
Definition of God = The total sum of human ignorance.
If you propose the existence of something, you must follow the scientific method in your defense of it’s existence, otherwise, I have no reason to listen to you.
*Faith* The excuse people give for believing something without good reason.>> *Faith, The grownup word for pretend. "Faith is believing what you know ain't so." — Mark Twain.
Not a person
http://bindingthefirm.myfastforum.org/d ... b3c912fb94
User avatar
Nunya_Bizness
Freeman
 
Posts: 747
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:53 pm
Has thanked: 132 time
Have thanks: 58 time

Re: The Queen may drive without a driver license

Postby Nunya_Bizness » Fri May 19, 2017 2:37 pm

Jethro:
No matter what other differences we may have in our beliefs or lack thereof, The information I have posted below is relevant to what you posted above.
[I have only re posted the body of the document here because the people of this site seem to not be able to click on links to documents.]
Notice


1. The issues here actually have nothing to do with driving without a license or presenting a birth certificate in order to be issued such a license. The issue here is, "What, exactly, is it that transpires in the application and issuance of a driver license? Or, put in the context of this notice, how does a man or woman born free and sovereign over their own entity, become a "person" obligated to apply to an agency of a totally artificial entity in order to be issued a driver license? Or, is there actually any actual obligation for a living, breathing, flesh and blood man or woman born free and sovereign over their own entity, to apply to an agency of a totally artificial entity in order, to be issued a driver license? What is the true and actual purpose behind the surreptitious procedure preceding the issuance of a driver license? Is the issuance of a driver license the true and actual reason for the presentation of the "applicant’s" birth certificate? Or is there another more devious purpose for such a specious requirement?
2. The issues here are much more fundamentally important, having to do with honesty, integrity and an acknowledgment by those "persons" administering the government, that the purpose for the creation of government in the first place was not to create a monster to micro manage the lives of the common people, but, rather, to provide an orderly way for societal interactive needs to be provided for, such as water supply, sewage disposal, and the warding off of foreign tyrants, and was not for the purpose of establishing a home grown tyranny with the authority to require everyone to get permission from the government in order to use an additional square or two of toilet paper.
3. Article one section six of the State of California Constitution, and the thirteenth amendment of the United States Constitution clearly and unambiguously prohibits involuntary servitude.
4. If the prohibition of involuntary servitude does not include a prohibition of mandatory driver licensing then what else is there that the government of State of California may require the people of California or State of California to do against their will? A better question is, "What, exactly, are the limitations in regard to the government’s ability to micro-manage the lives of everyone in California and State of California?" And an even more relevant question is,
"Where, under the natural limitations on government examined herein above, wherein it was established that government may not reasonably or properly be imbued with any more authority than the authority imbued by Nature into any one single living, breathing, flesh and blood man or woman, where, then, does the government get the authority to require any "person" to be issued a driver license prior to operating a motor vehicle on the highways of California and State of California?" Please note that I am not stating that the government does not have such authority, I am asking the question, "Where does this authority properly and reasonably come from?" (Well, the word "reasonably" may be a stretch, but there is no doubt that such authority has been legally acquired, at least as such authority applies to "persons", as the word "person" is defined in §470 of the State of California Vehicle code.
5. I will answer that question herein below in regard to any purported requirement for every living,
breathing, flesh and blood man and woman to procure a "driver license" prior to using their own
privately owned self-propelled conveyance/household goods. I further contend that in my answer to the
above question I will establish that the Legislature of State of California agrees with me on the issue of
driver license requirements. Again, as I have reiterated several times herein, the issue we are examining
is much more fundamental than the matter of a driver license.
How do I arrive at my comprehension of the intention of the Legislature? By actually reading the words
they used and adhering to them, paying attention to the grammatical manner in which the statutes are
written; giving the Legislature full credit for creating the definitions to be grammatically correct as they
are set forth in the State of California Vehicle Code, so that the Codes of State of California, written as
they are, may be readily decoded by the astute reader, and, so that the definitions included therein are
in full compliance with Article one section six of the State of California Constitution’s prohibition of
Involuntary Servitude.
6. The issue as to who is required to conform under the State of California Codes is based on whether
the living, breathing, flesh and blood man or woman is a "person" as the word "person" is defined in
§470 of the State of California Vehicle Code; and whether or not the living, breathing flesh and blood
man or woman has been successfully and legally induced or "seduced", to "volunteer" to claim to be
such "person", a status to which I have not agreed! (As a side comment, every living, breathing,
breathing flesh and blood man or woman present in California and State of California does, of course,
have a political relationship with State of California; mine being that I have not volunteered myself to
submit to the dominion of State of California by becoming a "person" as the word "person" is defined in
§470 Of the State of California Vehicle Code. Therefore, I am an alien to State of California.)
7. As afore stated, the issue of this is limited to examining and determining whether or not I am a
"person" as the word "person" is defined in §470 Of the State of California Vehicle Code. I would then be
required to apply for a driver license under the codes of State of California prior to operating a motor
vehicle on the highways of California and State of California. This takes more than a cursory examination
because there is more to it than may be found in just one subsection of the State of California Vehicle
Code. It is like playing the computer card game, Freecell, where you often must move single cards in the
wrong way in order to be able to later move them in the right way.
8. What I will demonstrate is that all living, breathing flesh and blood men and women born on the land
area claimed by State of California to be under its dominion, are, at the time they were born, born free
and politically independent; that when born every human baby is devoid of even the most minuscule
amount of ability to evaluate whether the information presented to it is good for it or good for
"someone else", the "someone else" being an indoctrination officer whose intention (knowingly or
unknowingly) is to program the child to accept a condition of virtually total servitude, without the child
ever being informed of the existence of any optional independent political status, or being prompted to
question the validity of the freedom negating information the "someone else" is indoctrinating the child
with.
9. I will demonstrate a sequence of events starting with (1) the creation and recording of an event, the
birth of a person(a)'s birth on a birth certificate; (2) programming instilled in the child during (3)
mandatory attendance in government indoctrination centers euphemistically known as "public schools";
then, (4) how the teenager or adult, having been appropriately subjected to mind controlling
indoctrination, (5) "voluntarily" presents him or herself to a local Department of Revenue Office, where
(6) the child now a teenager or adult "voluntarily" and eagerly, and proudly, (7) presents "his or her"
birth certificate in order to (8) be issued the much coveted State of California driver license. (The birth
certificate the teenager or adult presents to the Revenue Office is as much "his or hers" as is "your" bus
or "your" taxicab, or "your" airplane, "yours"!).
10. The relevant State of California Vehicle Code provides: (a)" §305. A "driver" is a person who drives or
is in actual physical control of a vehicle. The term "driver" does not include the tillerman or other person
who, in an auxiliary capacity, assists the driver in the steering or operation of any articulated firefighting
apparatus.
(b)" An "owner" is a person having all the incidents of ownership, including the legal title of a vehicle
whether or not such person lends, rents, or creates a security interest in the vehicle; the person entitled
to the possession of a vehicle as the purchaser under a security agreement; or the State, or any county,
city, district, or political subdivision of the State, or the United States, when entitled to the possession
and use of a vehicle under a lease, lease-sale, or rental-purchase agreement for a period of 30
consecutive days or more.
(c) "Person" includes a natural person, firm, copartnership, association, limited liability company, or
corporation. Be that as it may, the term “Person” includes six items in the definition of the word person:
1) natural person, 2) firm, 3)copartnership, 4)association, 5)limited liability company, 6)corporation.
11. To the casual reader it will seem clear that items (2) through (6) are artificial entities and it is will
likewise seem clear to the casual reader, that number (1) is intended to refer to real live flesh and blood
men and women, but number (1) does not clearly indicate such to be the case. To the casual reader it
would seem the intention of the statutory definition of "person" is to legally establish that real live flesh
and blood men and women are not any different from corporations like Walmart. However, the more
astute reader will recall that we were all taught in grammar school that the definition of a word will
never ever include the word being defined in its own definition. That is, a word cannot be used to define
itself, so, when the word "person" is included in the definition of the word "person" such inclusion is
either an unacceptable grammatical error or, more likely, the word "natural", coupled with the word
"person", somehow modifies the word "person" so that the inclusion of the word "person" in the
definition of itself does not constitute a grammatical error.
12. There can be no doubt that the legislators who created this statute were well aware of the words
"men" and "women" which might seem to have been more appropriately used in the definition of
"person", that is, if it was the actual intent of the Legislature to legally equate real live flesh and blood
men and women with Walmart., So, Reason will indicate that the legislature’s use instead, of the term
"natural person", was clearly intentional; that is, the legislators intentionally avoided the use of the
words "men" and "women" because to use those words would have actually created a grammatical
error, and would have been otherwise undesirable because the term "natural person" is also a reference
to an artificial entity, as I shall explain as I go along. I contend that everything ever written by any
legislature is, if nothing else, always grammatically correct. So then, how does the word "natural"
modify the word "person" in order to avoid a grammatical error?
13. Another question here is "What could have been the reason for the Legislature’s inclusion of five
clearly artificial entities in the definition of the word "person" if the purpose of the definition of the
word "person" was to indicate that such word was intended to refer to or include real live flesh and
blood men and women? Clearly such was not the purpose! So, in order to discern the purpose we must
examine the similarities of these five artificial items as they relate to each other and then examine and
determine how these similarities apply or relate to the term "natural person", the first item in the
definition of "person", in order to avoid grammatical incorrectness?
15. The first discernment will be to conclude, in order for the definition to be grammatically correct, that
the term (1)"natural person", as included in the definition of the word "person" in §470 of the State of
California Vehicle Code is intended to be and is also an artificial entity, similar in every significant aspect
to its definition mates, such mates being; (2)"firms", (3)"copartnerships", (4)"associations," (5)" limited
liability company " and (6)”corporations”. That is, all six of these artificial entities numbered herein are
(a) created by voluntary human intellectual activity; (b) all six have official government approved
creating documents; (c) all six are registered with the government; (d) all six have, through their human
creating agents, voluntarily obligated themselves to obey and conform to the commands of the State of
California Legislature; (e) all six have a name conjured up by their private sector creators and, last but
not least, (f) all six are required by the government to have a government issued license.
16. The foregoing explains how the six items in §470 of the State of California Vehicle Code are all six,
artificial entities, so there is no grammatical error in the inclusion of "natural person" therein, but the
means by which real live flesh and blood men and women are enticed, induced or seduced into
"volunteering" Themselves into servitude, as statutorily defined "persons" equal to Walmart, takes more
examination and analysis, as I shall explain:
17. As no single man or woman has natural authority to command non-volunteers to obey, the human
creators of State of California cannot possibly imbue State of California with authority to do so either,
therefore, in order for State of California to be able to command subservience of real live flesh and
blood men and women State of California must, somehow, entice, induce or seduce real live flesh and
blood men and women to voluntarily submit themselves to the political authority of the artificial entity,
State of California. So how does State of California do that?
18. Engaging in subterfuge and deceit, how else do politicians "get things done"? This was not done
overnight, many generations have passed thereby enabling the ploy to be gradually implanted in
succeeding generations without hardly anyone ever questioning how it all came about.
19. There is a combination here of (1) the birth certificate and its registration with and abandonment to
the government; (2) the indoctrination of the populace through public education when they are
children; (3) the Legislature enacting enabling legislation; and (4) the young adult’s burning desire to be
issued their peer driven status symbol, a driver license.
20. It is important to understand that when born we humans have no knowledge of any kind. It is
important to be cognitively aware that everything that we learned and absorbed as children we learned
from someone else or from our innocent observations. Our first teachers were, most likely, our own
parents, then, at about age five, it was the public school governmental indoctrination system and this is
the beginning of our intentional downhill slide into being a "person" as the word "person" is defined in
§470 of the State of California Vehicle Code. §470. "Person" includes a natural person, firm,
copartnership, association, limited liability company, or corporation. And also in all other State of
California codes that I can find.
11405.70. "Person" includes an individual, partnership, corporation, governmental subdivision or unit of
a governmental subdivision, or public or private organization or entity of any character.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE
SECTION 3479-3484
3482.1. (a) As used in this section: (1) "Person" means an individual, proprietorship, partnership,
corporation, club, or other legal entity.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
SECTION 1235.110-1235.210
1235.160. "Person" includes any public entity, individual, association, organization, partnership, trust,
limited liability company, or corporation.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA EVIDENCE CODE
175. "Person" includes a natural person, firm, association, organization, partnership, business, trust,
corporation, limited liability company, or public entity.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA PROBATE CODE
56. "Person" means an individual, corporation, government or governmental subdivision or agency,
business trust, estate, trust, partnership, limited liability company, association, or other entity.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL CODE
(30) "Person" includes an individual or an organization. (See Section 1102.)
Section K:
TITLE 26 U.S.C., SECTION 7343
IN PART:
Part O: Title 26 U.S.C. Sec. 7343.
Part P: United States Code Congressional and Administrative News
Part Q: Sections derived from other sections.
Part Q(17): Section 7343 is derived from:
Part O:Title 26 U.S.C. Sec. 7343.
TITLE 26, Subtitle F, CHAPTER 75, Subchapter D, Sec. 7343: Sec. 7343. Definition of term "person “The
term "person" as used in this chapter includes an officer or employee of a corporation,or a member or
employee of a partnership, who as such officer, employee, or member is under a duty to perform the
act in respect of which the violation occurs.
Part P:
United States Code Congressional and Administrative News
~1: 83 rd Congress Second Session 1954 -Vol. 3 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
INTERNAL REVENUE CODE -1954
SUBTITLE F PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION
CHAPTER 61BINFORMATION AND RETURNS
~13: § 7343. Definition of term "person"
This section continues in one place the provision now found in the various criminal provisions of the
existing Internal Revenue Code.
Part Q: Sections derived from other sections. ~1: Title 26 U.S.C. (1986) Sections ~2: Derived from
Sections the 1939as follows below: Code as follow below: (Derived from) ~1(s): 7343: ~2(s): 145(d),
894(b)(2)(D), 1718(d), 1821(a)(4), 2557(b)( , 2707(d), 3228, 3710(c), 3793(b)(2). Part Q(17):.Section 7343
is derived from: ~1: §7343 is derived from the 1939 Code sections as follows: ~2: 145(d): (d) CROSS
REFERENCE .-For penalties for failure to file information returns with respect to foreign personal holding
companies and foreign corporation, see section 340. ~3: 894(b)(2)(D): (D) The term "person" as used in
this paragraphs (B) and (C) includes an officer or employee of a corporation or a member or employee of
a partnership, who as such officer, employee, or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of
which the violation occurs. ~3(a): § 894(b)(2)(D) are under ESTATES TAX. ~4: 1718(d): (d) The term
"person" as used in this subsection includes an officer or employee of a corporation or a member or
employee of a partnership, who as such officer, employee, or member is under a duty to perform the
act in respect of which the violation occurs. ~4(a): § 1718(d) are under ADMISSIONS AND DUES.
~5: 1821(a)(4): (4) The term "person" as used in this subsection includes an officer or employee of a
corporation or a member or employee of a partnership, who as such officer, employee, or member is
under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs. ~5(a): § 1821(a)(4) are under
CHAPTER 11BDOCUMENTS, OTHERINSTRUMENTS, AND PLAYING CARDS. ~6: 2557(b)( : ( The term
"person" as used in paragraphs (2) (3) and (4) includes an officer or employee of a corporation or a
member or employee of a partnership, who as such officer, employee, or member is under a duty to
perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs. ~6(a): § 2557(b)( are under CHAPTER 23B
NARCOTICS. ~7: 2707(d): (d) The term "person" as used in this section includes an officer or employee of
a corporation, or a member or employee of a partnership, who as such officer, employee, or member is
under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs. ~7(a): § 2707(d) are under
CHAPTER 25B FIREARMS. ~8: 3228: SEC. 3228. DEFINITIONS..(a) PERSON . The word "person" as used in
this part and subchapter A or chapter 23 shall be construed to mean and include a partnership,
association, company, or corporation, as well as a natural person. ~8(a): § 3228 are under Part V
Narcotics. ~9: 3710(c):(c) PERSON DEFINED . The term "person" as used in this section includes an officer
or employee of a corporation or a member or employee of a partnership, who as such officer, employee,
or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs.
[Continued in next post]
Last edited by Nunya_Bizness on Fri May 19, 2017 3:04 pm, edited 8 times in total.
Apistevist
noun
- a person (not a legal person)who does not use faith to know things, especially in the religious sense
The burden of proof lies(Prevarication) on religion.
Theism:
"The belief that logic and the brain deducing the logic is not flawed to the point that one can come to the conclusion/belief that god(s) exists." -Nunya_Biziness
Definition of God = The total sum of human ignorance.
If you propose the existence of something, you must follow the scientific method in your defense of it’s existence, otherwise, I have no reason to listen to you.
*Faith* The excuse people give for believing something without good reason.>> *Faith, The grownup word for pretend. "Faith is believing what you know ain't so." — Mark Twain.
Not a person
http://bindingthefirm.myfastforum.org/d ... b3c912fb94
User avatar
Nunya_Bizness
Freeman
 
Posts: 747
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:53 pm
Has thanked: 132 time
Have thanks: 58 time

Re: The Queen may drive without a driver license

Postby Nunya_Bizness » Fri May 19, 2017 2:40 pm

22. At the age of five or six years the child is enrolled in government indoctrination centers
euphemistically known as "public schools" where the child is indoctrinated for the next thirteen years to
believe he or she was born into United States citizenship and is likewise indoctrinated to believe that
through such "birth" he or she was automatically, by such "birth", also born into being a citizen of State
of California. Please take Mandatory Judicial Notice that it is physically impossible for a real live flesh
and blood human baby to be born in an artificial entity or to be born automatically into citizenship of
such an artificial entity.
23. At the age of sixteen years the child, at that time having attained the age where he or she is
recognized to be a somewhat responsible adult, is old enough to volunteer him or herself into a
condition of servitude known as "citizenship", for which the child has been indoctrinated to believe and
accept without question that he or she was automatically born into. Among honest people, this is known
as "fraudulent inducement".
24. During the first sixteen years of his or her life, and especially after entering "High School", these
young adults have been programmed to believe that he or she must present "his" or "her" birth
certificate to the local Department of Revenue Office in order to be issued a State of California driver
license.
25. Thereupon, the young adult presents his or her self to the said Revenue Office where the young
adult proudly presents "his" or "her" birth certificate, whereupon, after some testing and skill
examination, the young adult is issued an State of California driver license, thereupon the young adult
has unknowingly and unwittingly relinquished the individual political sovereignty and independence he
or she was born with and volunteered his or her self into a condition of voluntary servitude with the
political status of a "person" as the word "person" is defined in §470 of the State of California Vehicle
Code.
26. That is, the birth certificate created by the child’s parents upon the "birth” of the child constituted
the creation of an artificial persona, such persona being the "name" entered on the birth certificate.
27. When the child’s parents inform the county recorder, and then the county recorder records that
document with the government recording office the parents failed to reserve any ownership rights or
interest in the said persona created and recorded therein. Such failure on the part of the parents
constitutes the abandonment of any ownership interest the parents may have had in the persona they
created and such abandonment causes the ownership interest to devolve upon the State of California.
28. When the child was born, an event was recorded on the birth certificate the child then presented
the birth certificate as a driver license applicant, the actual transaction had very little to do with the
licensing of the applicants operation of a self-propelled conveyance on the public way of California, the
presentation of the birth certificate had considerable to do with establishing that the applicant was
thereupon and thereafter, a "person" as the word "person" is defined in §470 of the State of California
Vehicle Code.
29. The application for the driver license would be more properly described as an application for a
license to enable the applicant to legally use government owned property, such property being the
"name" entered on the "applicant’s" birth certificate. Through the application for and issuance of the
driver license, the applicant unknowingly and unwittingly agreed to function as a "person" under the
persona, under the artificial guise of an artificial entity, designated as a "natural person", as the term
"natural person" is included among five other artificial persons in the definition of the word "person" in
§470 of the State of California Vehicle Code.
30. How can a "person" be construed to be an artificial entity? Only by a skillfully contrived statutory
enactment:
31. As involuntary servitude is prohibited by both the Thirteenth Amendment to the Federal
Constitution and Article one section six of the State of California Constitution, the Legislators had to
devise a clever scheme whereby it could be legally claimed that all real live flesh and blood men and
women were subject to the statutes of State of California, without the scheme devised being an overt
violation of the Constitutional prohibitions of involuntary servitude. Additionally, the scheme they
devised would need to make it possible for it to be legally claimed that real live flesh and blood men and
women were subject to the jurisdiction of State of California, an artificial entity. By cleverly defining the
common word "person" to include several artificial entities and include among them the term "natural
person" the legislators would be able to befuddle all but the most astute linguists.
32. At the time the definition of the word "person" was "discovered" the attention was cunningly
focused on the Legislatures defining of firms, copartnerships, associations, limited liability companies
and corporations, all to be persons with many of the Constitutionally protected rights of "natural
persons", which protections are in many ways very reasonable as corporate owners of property had
legal interests to protect and legal obligation to be met. The fact that the term "natural person" included
in the definition of "person" would be surreptitiously used to cause real live flesh and blood men and
women to "voluntarily" submit themselves to the political authority of an artificial entity through their
"voluntary" application to use the artificial persona "name" created by the filing of "their" birth
certificate at the time of "their" birth, during their application for a driver license, was totally missed by
everyone, except those who intentionally implemented the scheme.
33. In examining the State of California Vehicle code.
An act to repeal and re-enact the Vehicle code.
[Chapter 3, Statutes of 1959, as amended to the close of the Legislative Session of 2005] The people of
the State of California do enact as follows: DIVISION 1. WORDS AND PHRASES DEFINED §305. A "driver"
is a person who drives or is in actual physical control of a vehicle. The term "driver" does not include the
tillerman or other person who, in an auxiliary capacity, assists the driver in the steering or operation of
any articulated firefighting apparatus.
34. In examining The State of California Vehicle Code we find additional definitions of terms having to do
with drivers:
State of California Vehicle Code
100. Unless the provision or context otherwise requires, these definitions shall govern the construction
of this code.
§435. "Nonresident" is a person who is not a resident of this State.
§516. "Resident" means any person who manifests an intent to live or be located in this state on more
than a temporary or transient basis. Presence in the state for six months or more in any 12-month
period gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of residency.
The following are evidence of residency for purposes of vehicle registration:
(a) Address where registered to vote.
(b) Location of employment or place of business.
(c) Payment of resident tuition at a public institution of higher education.
(d) Attendance of dependents at a primary or secondary school.
(e) Filing a homeowner's property tax exemption.
(f) Renting or leasing a home for use as a residence.
(g) Declaration of residency to obtain a license or any other privilege or benefit not ordinarily extended
to a nonresident.
(h) Possession of a State of California driver's license.
(i) Other acts, occurrences, or events that indicate presence in the state is more than temporary or
transient.
§305. A "driver" is a person who drives or is in actual physical control of a vehicle. The term "driver"
does not include the tillerman or other person who, in an auxiliary capacity, assists the driver in the
steering or operation of any articulated firefighting apparatus.
§460. An "owner" is a person having all the incidents of ownership, including the legal title of a vehicle
whether or not such person lends, rents, or creates a security interest in the vehicle; the person entitled
to the possession of a vehicle as the purchaser under a security agreement; or the State, or any county,
city, district, or political subdivision of the State, or the United States, when entitled to the possession
and use of a vehicle under a lease, lease-sale, or rental-purchase agreement for a period of 30
consecutive days or more.
§470. "Person" includes a natural person, firm, copartnership, association, limited liability company, or
corporation.
State of California Vehicle Code, Division 6. DRIVERS’ LICENSES.
Chapter 1, Article 1. Persons required to be licensed, Exemptions, and age limits. Unlawful to drive
unless licensed
§12500. (a) A person may not drive a motor vehicle upon a highway, unless the person then holds a valid
driver's license issued under this code, except those persons who are expressly exempted under this
code.
(b) A person may not drive a motorcycle, motor-driven cycle, or motorized bicycle upon a highway,
unless the person then holds a valid driver's license or endorsement issued under this code for that
class, except those persons who are expressly exempted under this code, or those persons specifically
authorized to operate motorized bicycles or motorized scooters with a valid driver's license of any class,
as specified in subdivision (h) of Section 12804.9.
(c) A person may not drive a motor vehicle in or upon any off street parking facility, unless the person
then holds a valid driver's license of the appropriate class or certification to operate the vehicle. As used
in this subdivision, "off street parking facility" means any off street facility held open for use by the
public for parking vehicles and includes any publicly owned facilities for off street parking, and privately
owned facilities for off street parking where no fee is charged for the privilege to park and which are
held open for the common public use of retail customers. (d) A person may not drive a motor vehicle or
combination of vehicles that is not of a type for which the person is licensed. (e) A motorized scooter
operated on public streets shall at all times be equipped with an engine that complies with the
applicable State Air Resources Board emission requirements. Person’s exempt
§12501. The following persons are not required to obtain a driver's license: (a) An officer or employee of
the United States, while operating a motor vehicle owned or controlled by the United States on the
business of the United States, except when the motor vehicle being operated is a commercial motor
vehicle, as defined in Section 15210. (b) Any person while driving or operating implements of husbandry
incidentally operated or moved over a highway, except as provided in Section 36300 or 36305. (c) Any
person driving or operating an off-highway motor vehicle subject to identification, as defined in Section
38012, while driving or operating such motor vehicle as provided in Section 38025. Nothing in this
subdivision authorizes operation of a motor vehicle by a person without a valid driver's license upon any
off street parking facility, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 12500.
§12502. (a) The following persons may operate a motor vehicle in this state without obtaining a driver's
license under this code: (1) A nonresident over the age of 18 years having in his or her immediate
possession a valid driver's license issued by a foreign jurisdiction of which he or she is a resident, except
as provided in Section
12505.
(2) A nonresident, 21 years of age or older, if transporting hazardous material, as defined in Section 353,
in a commercial vehicle, having in his or her immediate possession, a valid license with the appropriate
endorsement issued by another state or other jurisdiction that is recognized by the department, or a
Canadian driver's license and a copy of his or her current training certificate to transport hazardous
material that complies with all federal laws and regulations with respect to hazardous materials, both of
which shall be in his or her immediate possession.
(3) A nonresident having in his or her immediate possession a valid driver's license, issued by the
Diplomatic Motor Vehicle Office of the Office of Foreign Missions of the United States Department of
State, for the type of motor vehicle or combination of vehicles that the person is operating. (b) Any
person entitled to the exemption contained in subdivision (a), while operating, within this state, a
commercial vehicle, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 15210, shall have in his or her possession a
current medical certificate of a type described in subdivision (c) of Section 12804.9, which has been
issued within two years of the date of operation of that vehicle. (c) A nonresident possessing a medical
certificate in accordance with subdivision (b) shall comply with any restriction of the medical certificate
issued to that nonresident. §12503. A nonresident over the age of 18 years whose home state or
country does not require the licensing of drivers may operate a foreign vehicle owned by him for not to
exceed 30 days without obtaining a license under this code.
§12504. (a) Sections 12502 and 12503 apply to any nonresident over the age of 16 years but under the
age of 18 years. The maximum period during which that nonresident may operate a motor vehicle in this
state without obtaining a driver's license is limited to a period of 10 days immediately following the
entry of the nonresident into this state except as provided in subdivision (b) of this section.
(b) Any nonresident over the age of 16 years but under the age of 18 years who is a resident of a foreign
jurisdiction which requires the licensing of drivers may continue to operate a motor vehicle in this state
after 10 days from his or her date of entry into this state if he or she meets both the following: (1) He or
she has a valid driver's license, issued by the foreign jurisdiction, in his or her immediate possession. (2)
He or she has been issued and has in his or her immediate possession a nonresident minor's certificate,
which the department issues to a nonresident minor who holds a valid driver's license issued to him or
her by his or her home state or country, and who files proof of financial responsibility. (c) Whenever any
of the conditions for the issuance of a nonresident minor's certificate cease to exist, the department
shall cancel the certificate and require the minor to surrender it to the department.
§12505. (a) (1) For purposes of this division only and notwithstanding Section 516, residency shall be
determined as a person's state of domicile. "State of domicile" means the state where a person has his
or her true, fixed, and permanent home and principal residence and to which he or she has manifested
the intention of returning whenever he or she is absent. Prima facie evidence of residency for driver's
licensing purposes includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A) Address where registered to vote.
(B) Payment of resident tuition at a public institution of higher education.
(C) Filing a homeowner's property tax exemption.
(D) Other acts, occurrences, or events that indicate presence in the state is more than temporary or
transient. (2) State of California residency is required of a person in order to be issued a commercial
driver's license under this code. (b) The presumption of residency in this state may be rebutted by
satisfactory evidence that the licensee's primary residence is in another state. (c) Any person entitled to
an exemption under Section 12502, 12503, or 12504 may operate a motor vehicle in this state for not to
exceed 10 days from the date he or she establishes residence in this state, except that he or she shall
obtain a license from the department upon becoming a resident before being employed for
compensation by another for the purpose of driving a motor vehicle on the highways. (d) If the State of
California is decertified by the federal government and prohibited from issuing an initial, renewal, or
upgraded commercial driver's license pursuant to Section 384.405 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, the following applies:
(1) An existing commercial driver's license issued pursuant to this code prior to the date that the state is
notified of its decertification shall remain valid until its expiration date.
(2) A person who is a resident of this state may obtain a nonresident commercial driver's license from
any state that elects to issue a nonresident commercial driver's license and that complies with the
testing and licensing standards contained in subparts F, G, and H of Part 383 of Title 49 of the Code of
Federal Regulations.
(3) For the purposes of this subdivision, a nonresident commercial driver's license is a commercial
driver's license issued by a state to an individual domiciled in a foreign country or in another state. (e)
Subject to Section 12504, a person over the age of 16 years who is a resident of a foreign jurisdiction
other than a state, territory, or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or Canada, having a valid driver's license issued to him or her by any
other foreign jurisdiction having licensing standards deemed by the Department of Motor Vehicles
equivalent to those of this state, may operate a motor vehicle in this state without obtaining a license
from the department, except that he or she shall obtain a license before being employed for
compensation by another for the purpose of driving a motor vehicle on the highways. (f) Any person
from a foreign country, except a territory or possession of the United States, the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, or Canada, shall obtain a class A or a class B license from the department before operating
on the highways a motor vehicle for which a class A or class B license is required, as described in Section
12804.9. The medical examination form required for issuance of a class A or class B driver's license shall
be completed by a health care professional, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section
12804.9, who is licensed, certified, or registered to perform physical examinations in the United States
of America. This subdivision does not apply to (1) drivers of school buses operated in California on a trip
for educational purposes or (2) drivers of vehicles used to provide the services of a local public agency.
(g) This section does not authorize the employment of a person in violation of Section 12515.
(h) This section shall become operative on September 20, 2005.
§12506. The department may issue a temporary driver's license to any person applying for a driver's
license, to any person applying for renewal of a driver's license, or to any licensee whose license is
required to be changed, added to, or modified. Notwithstanding subdivision (b) of Section 12805, the
department may issue a temporary driver's license to an applicant who has previously been licensed in
this state or in any other state, territory, or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or the Dominion of Canada, notwithstanding that the applicant has
failed the written examination on the person's first attempt. A temporary license permits the operation
of a motor vehicle upon the highways for a period of 60 days, if the licensee has the temporary license in
his or her immediate possession, and while the department is completing its investigation and
determination of all facts relative to the applicant's right to receive a license. The temporary license is
invalid when the applicant's license has been issued or refused. §12508. When in the opinion of the
department it would be in the interest of safety, the department may issue, in individual cases, to any
applicant for a driver's license, a license limited in duration to less than the regular term. Upon the
expiration of a limited term license the department may extend its duration for an additional period
without fee but the duration of the license and extensions shall not exceed the term of a regular license.
35. Throughout the Codes of State of California we find a universal use of the word "person", even in the
subsections setting forth who shall be exempted from driver licensing there is no mention of any driver
who would not be a "person" as the word "person" is defined in §470 of the State of California Vehicle
Code. This repetitious emphatic use of the word "person" is clearly intended to be interpreted by the
casual reader as a reference to real live flesh and blood men and women without overtly including the
words "men" and "women" in any way that would cause a grammatical error to exist in the definition of
the word "person", and there are innumerable definitions of the word "person" throughout the Codes of
State of California. None of these many definitions include the words "men" or "women". In every
instance every definition of the word "person" includes several categories of various artificial entities. In
every one of these many definitions the very first item included in every definition of the word "person"
is the term "natural person". In every instance the additional items included in such definitions are,
without exception, several items all clearly being some manner of artificial entity, such as "firm",
"copartnership", "association",” limited liability company”"corporation", etc. In not one single instance
could I find a definition of the word "person" in the Codes of State of California which included the
words "men" or "women".
36. In the definition of "driver" in The State of California Vehicle Code we find: Ҥ305. A "driver" is a
person who drives or is in actual physical control of a vehicle. The term "driver" does not include the
tillerman or other person who, in an auxiliary capacity, assists the driver in the steering or operation of
any articulated firefighting apparatus.”
37. It is clear that this section’s intention is to convey, by implication, that the "driver" mentioned
therein, is a person who drives or is in actual physical control of a vehicle. The term "driver" does not
include the tillerman or other person who, in an auxiliary capacity, assists the driver in the steering or
operation of any articulated firefighting apparatus, to be a real live flesh and blood man or woman. It is
additionally quite clear that this definition of "driver" is intended to very clearly exclude "firm",
"copartnership", "association", “limited liability company” and "corporation" from the definition of
"driver", even though §305’s primary candidate to be designated as A "driver" is a person who drives or
is in actual physical control of a vehicle yes, "a person” except in this instance, the term "a person" is not
intended to include every artificial person included in the definition of the word "person", because
"firms", "copartnerships", "associations", and "corporations" have no ability to climb behind the steering
wheel and be "in actual physical control of a vehicle upon a highway or ... exercise... control over or
steer... a vehicle being towed by a motor vehicle."! How duplicitous can a legislature get in its endeavors
to avoid revealing its true intent?
[continued in next post]
Apistevist
noun
- a person (not a legal person)who does not use faith to know things, especially in the religious sense
The burden of proof lies(Prevarication) on religion.
Theism:
"The belief that logic and the brain deducing the logic is not flawed to the point that one can come to the conclusion/belief that god(s) exists." -Nunya_Biziness
Definition of God = The total sum of human ignorance.
If you propose the existence of something, you must follow the scientific method in your defense of it’s existence, otherwise, I have no reason to listen to you.
*Faith* The excuse people give for believing something without good reason.>> *Faith, The grownup word for pretend. "Faith is believing what you know ain't so." — Mark Twain.
Not a person
http://bindingthefirm.myfastforum.org/d ... b3c912fb94
User avatar
Nunya_Bizness
Freeman
 
Posts: 747
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:53 pm
Has thanked: 132 time
Have thanks: 58 time

Re: The Queen may drive without a driver license

Postby Nunya_Bizness » Fri May 19, 2017 2:40 pm

38. The clear intention here, in the definition of the word "driver", is to include only one specific
"person" among the five artificial persons included in the definition of the word "person" in §305 and
that "artificial person" is the "person" who presented a birth certificate in order to be issued a driver
license and thereby "volunteer" to be included in the class designated as a "natural person" in §305. The
reason the Legislature could not and did not use the words "man" or "woman" in any of its many
definitions of the word "person" in the Codes of State of California is because "man" and "woman" are
not words that in any way lend themselves well in references to such artificial persons as "firms",
"copartnerships", "associations", or "corporations" “limited liability company” OR "NATURAL PERSONS",
when the term "natural person" is intended by the Legislature to designate an artificial persona!
39. The previous careful analysis of the definitions of "person" and "driver" as such are incorporated in
the State of California Code enables us to construct the intent of the legislature by use of reasonable
interpretation and thereby avoid totally absurd applications of such statutes, as was ruled by the U.S.
Supreme Court in excerpts from rulings thereof as set forth herein below in the following cases, all of
which were referenced by SCOTUS in HOLY TRINITY CHURCH v. U.S. 143 U.S. 457, 12 S.Ct. 511, 36 L.Ed.
226, Feb. 29, 1892 "In Pier Co. v. Hannam, 3 Barn. & Ald. 266, ABBOTT, C. J., quotes from Lord Coke as
follows: 'Acts of parliament are to be so construed as no man that is innocent or free from [causing]
injury or wrong [doing] be, by a literal construction [of the statute], punished or endangered. "
"In the case of State v. Clark, 29 N. J. Law, 96, 99, [I]n what sense is the term 'willful' used? In common
parlance, 'willful' is used in the sense of 'intentional,' as distinguished from 'accidental' or 'involuntary.'
Whatever one does intentionally, he does willfully. Is it used in that sense in this act? Did the legislature
intend to make the intentional opening of a fence for the purpose of going upon the land of another
indictable, if done by permission or for a lawful purpose? * * * We cannot suppose such to have been
the actual intent. To adopt such a construction would put a stop to the ordinary business of life. The
language of the act, if construed literally, evidently leads to an absurd result. If a literal construction of
the words of a statute be absurd, the act must be so construed as to avoid the absurdity. The court must
restrain the words. The object designed to be reached by the act must limit and control the literal
import of the terms and phrases employed."
40. In the above opinion there can be no reasonable doubt that SCOTUS intended its explanation of the
common meaning of "willful" to only apply where the intentionally done act was done by an living,
breathing man or woman who was fully and properly informed of all of the ramifications of his or her
"willful" act prior thereto; that an act done as a result of intentionally misleading indoctrination of the
living, breathing man or woman as a child, by the entity that was thereafter purporting to hold the
living, breathing man or woman to acts done as a result of the intentional misleading indoctrination,
would be prohibited on the basis of the principle of Estoppel. As SCOTUS stated, "To adopt such a
construction would put a stop to the ordinary business of life."
41. However, there is another consideration as to what may or may not be "willful" that the Supreme
Court did not mention in the foregoing: Bouvier’s Law Encyclopedia 3rd Rev. 8th Edition, 1914 provides
the meaning of "Involuntary" is as follows: "Involuntary, An involuntary act is that which is performed
with constraint or with repugnance, or without the will to do it. An act is involuntary when it is done
under duress."
42. It is clear that Bouvier’s meaning conveys that an act, even though intentionally done, is not
"willfully" done when done under duress.
43. Additionally, in the foregoing SCOTUS opined that where a literal application of the wording of a
statute would result in an absurd result, the wording must "restrain the words". Back to SCOTUS in Holy
Trinity: " In U. S. v. Kirby, 7 Wall. 482, 486 "The question as to the sufficiency of this plea was certified to
this court, and it not an obstruction of the mail, or the retarding of the passage of a carrier of the mail,
within the meaning of the act. In its opinion the court says: 'All laws should receive a sensible
construction. General terms should be so limited in their application as not to lead to injustice,
oppression, or an absurd consequence. It will always, therefore, be presumed that the legislature
intended exceptions to its language which would avoid results of this character. The reason of the law in
such cases should prevail over its letter. "
" The following cases may also be cited: Henry v. Tilson, 17 Vt. 479; Ryegate v. Wardsboro, 30 Vt. 743; Ex
parte Ellis, 11 Cal. 220; Ingraham v. Speed, 30 Miss. 410; Jackson v. Collins, 3 Cow. 89; People v.
Insurance Co.,15 Johns. 358; Burch v. Newbury, 10 N. Y. 374; People v. [143 U.S. 457,
462]Commissioners, 95 N. Y.554, 558; People v. Lacombe, 99 N. Y. 43, 49, 1 N. E. Rep. 599; Chesapeake&
Ohio Canal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 4 Gill & J. 152; Osgood v. Breed, 12 Mass. 525, 530; Wilbur v.
Crane, 13 Pick.284; Oates v. Bank, 100 U. S. 239. " "Among other things which may be considered in
determining the intent of the legislature is the title of the act. We do not mean that it may be used to
add to or take from the body of the statute, (Hadden v. Collector, 5 Wall. 107,) but it may help to
interpret its meaning. In the case of U. S. v. Fisher, 2 Cranch, 358, 386, Chief Justice MARSHALL said: 'On
the influence which the title ought to have in construing the enacting clauses, much has been said, and
yet it is not easy to discern the point of difference between the opposing counsel in this respect. Neither
party contends that the title of an act can control plain words in the body of the statute; and neither
denies that, taken with other parts, it may assist in removing ambiguities. Where the intent is plain,
nothing is left to construction. Where the mind labors to discover the design of the legislature, it seizes
everything from which aid can be derived; and in such case the title claims a degree of notice, and will
have its due share of consideration.' And in the case of U. S. v. Palmer, 3 Wheat. 610, 631, the same
judge applied the doctrine in this way: 'The words of the section are in terms of unlimited extent. The
words 'any person or persons' are broad enough to comprehend every human being. But general words
must not only be limited to cases within the jurisdiction of the state, but also to those objects to which
the legislature intended to apply them. Did the legislature intend to apply these words to the subjects of
a foreign power, who in a foreign ship may commit murder or robbery on the high seas? The title of an
act cannot control its words, but may furnish some aid in showing what was in the mind of the
legislature. The title of this act is, 'An act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States.'
It would seem that offenses against the United States, not offenses against the human race, were the
crimes which the legislature intended by this law to punish. "
44. In this instant case, the general application of the common word "person" has been supplanted by
the mere fact that the Legislature of State of California has created a statutory definition of this word
and the statutory meaning contrived by the Legislature must be applied in accordance with the clear
intent of such Legislature. However true that may be, there are still limitations as to the application
thereof. As stated in the above HOLY TRINITY excerpt, SCOTUS therein opined that a state may not,
through the general application of common words or phraseology, expand the State’s authority beyond
its reasonable boundaries.
45. By the Legislature’s failure to include the words "men" and "women" in the statutory definition of
the word "person", the Legislature’s clearly demonstrated that their intent to supplant the commonly
understood meaning of the word "person" to specifically exclude real live flesh and blood men and
women, if this were not true the Legislators would have included the words "men" and "women" in its
definition of the word "person"; and would have included the words "men" and "women" in its
statutory definition of the common word "driver".
46. When taken together the definitions of the words "person" and the word "driver" are
complementary, the statutory definition of each supports the statutory definition of the other. It is
clearly the intention of the Legislature to exclude real live flesh and blood men and women from both!
47. As the Constitution of both the United States and State of California prohibit involuntary servitude
the Legislature cannot and did not use phraseology such as (or similar to) "all persons", in order to
extend the authority of State of California beyond its constitutionally established boundaries. The
inclusion of such phraseology in the statutes of State of California may not be construed to in any way
unconstitutionally expand such limited authority in order to unconstitutionally extend such authority
over living, breathing men and woman who have not willingly, knowingly and intentionally, being fully
informed of the negative consequences thereof prior thereto, voluntarily agreed to submit them self to
the authority of the government of the artificial entity, State of California.
48. The issue here is not whether or not I could use some birth certificate in order to be issued a driver
license, that issue is of no immediate significance! However, on that issue, why should I? Can it be
reasonably denied that I have the natural born and naturally acquired right to determine for myself
whether or not I will "volunteer"? Until I willingly, knowingly and intentionally, being fully informed of
the negative consequences thereof prior thereto, voluntarily agree to submit myself to the authority of
the government of the artificial entity, State of California, the issue of whether there might be or is a
birth certificate I could use in order for me to be issued an State of California driver license is a totally
moot issue! Bouvier’s Law Encyclopedia 3rd Rev. 8th Edition, 1914 provides the meaning of
"Involuntary" as follows: "Involuntary, An involuntary act is that which is performed with constraint or
with repugnance, or without the will to do it. An act is involuntary when it is done under duress."
49. Bouvier’s meaning of "wilful" applies equally to an individual who was intentionally indoctrinated
with lies in order to seduce him into "voluntarily" complying with State of California codes, "An act is
involuntary when it is done as a result of having been intentionally and wrongfully indoctrinated by the
lying government of State of California."
50. And when State of California was not the actual perpetrator of the criminal indoctrination of the
living, breathing men and woman when the living, breathing man or woman was a child, but then, later,
State of California intentionally attempts to reap benefits from the wrongful indoctrination of its
criminal contemporaries, the governments or the other Forty-nine states of the Federation known as
the United States, in this particular instance such criminal contemporary being the government of the
artificial entity, State of California, State of California thereby compounds its unforgivable insidious
criminal activities! A key word and principle here, is ESTOPPEL!
51. The issue here, as I wrote herein above, is honesty and integrity of government in its relations with
the general populace.
Law Dictionary 4th Ed, "fiduciary"; A person having a legal duty, created by his undertaking, to act
primarily for the benefit of another in matters connected with his undertaking; in the nature of a
position of trust or holding confidence. For example, a trustee has a fiduciary obligation to the
beneficiary of a trust and acts as a fiduciary in his management of the trust property. An attorney has a
fiduciary relationship with his client, etc.
The name associated with the debt is, in absence of evidence to the contrary, derived of the original of
the copy of the Certificate of Live Birth attached.
I am not and did not consent to be a party to the undertaking, nor do I have actual or constructive
possession of the original Certificate of Live Birth, nor am I the fiduciary. I am the living man, and I own
nothing.
I wave the right to,,,and do not consent to be recognized as a person, whoever, individual, you, sir or
any other artificial label/entity!
I am simply a Living, breathing, flesh, bone and blood sentient man created in the image of my creators.
Included with this notice is a photocopy of a certified copy of a certificate of live birth acknowledging
State of California’s indemnity certificate of usufruct to the living spoliated owner.
The inclusion of this photocopy is not to be construed as an act or claim to the "name" upon that
certificate, but only notice of use.
Use cannot be construed as a claim of ownership.
As OBLIGEE/GRANTOR and DONOR for all credit to the UNITED STATES, by and through its Registered
Name, JOHN HENRY SMITH,
I forgive and Absolve all the debt for JOHN HENRY SMITH registered by the STATE OF California, as my
GIFT to the UNITED STATES on the condition all debt be canceled and retired and never reissued.
"U.S.C. 3113 . Accepting gifts
(a) To provide the people of the United States with an opportunity to make gifts to the United States
Government to be used to reduce the public debt-
(1) the Secretary of the Treasury may accept for the Government a gift of-
(B) an obligation of the Government included in the public debt made only on the condition that the
obligation be canceled and retired and not reissued; "
Apistevist
noun
- a person (not a legal person)who does not use faith to know things, especially in the religious sense
The burden of proof lies(Prevarication) on religion.
Theism:
"The belief that logic and the brain deducing the logic is not flawed to the point that one can come to the conclusion/belief that god(s) exists." -Nunya_Biziness
Definition of God = The total sum of human ignorance.
If you propose the existence of something, you must follow the scientific method in your defense of it’s existence, otherwise, I have no reason to listen to you.
*Faith* The excuse people give for believing something without good reason.>> *Faith, The grownup word for pretend. "Faith is believing what you know ain't so." — Mark Twain.
Not a person
http://bindingthefirm.myfastforum.org/d ... b3c912fb94
User avatar
Nunya_Bizness
Freeman
 
Posts: 747
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:53 pm
Has thanked: 132 time
Have thanks: 58 time

Re: The Queen may drive without a driver license

Postby MichaelLynch:Freeman » Fri May 19, 2017 7:19 pm

I am simply a Living, breathing, flesh, bone and blood sentient man created in the image of my creators.


What exactly does the quote above mean? Was the living, breathing, flesh-and-blood man created in the image of a tree, a frog, a cat, or what may I ask? I mean, if one does not believe in YHWH (God) as Creator, then who or what are these "creators" this man was made in the image of? How did the "creators" know to create a man or woman? BTW, I only know of one Creator NOT "creators" (plural).
MichaelLynch:Freeman
Freeman
 
Posts: 803
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 1:07 pm
Has thanked: 34 time
Have thanks: 23 time

Re: The Queen may drive without a driver license

Postby Shoonra » Fri May 19, 2017 10:27 pm

Queen Elizabeth II may be able to drive without bothering to get a license but ....

(1) whenever she does drive, her car is preceded and followed by Royal Household cars, loaded with bodyguards, and they generally make sure that Her Britannic Majesty is never in danger nor causing danger; and

(2) during WW2, when she was just Lt. Windsor in the Royal Army Women's Corps she was assigned to the motor pool, and her job was to maintain jeeps and other vehicles and to drive VIPs, including her father.

Your status as Perpetual Drama Queen does not carry similar privileges.
/ Shoonra
"Rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft."
First Samuel 15:23
User avatar
Shoonra
Statist
 
Posts: 5169
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 2:14 am
Location: suburban Maryland
Has thanked: 20 time
Have thanks: 208 time

Re: The Queen may drive without a driver license

Postby Jethro! » Sat May 20, 2017 1:23 am

Shoonra wrote:Queen Elizabeth II may be able to drive without bothering to get a license but ....

(1) whenever she does drive, her car is preceded and followed by Royal Household cars, loaded with bodyguards, and they generally make sure that Her Britannic Majesty is never in danger nor causing danger; and

So if I arrange for an auto caravan that ensures I'm never in danger nor causing danger, does that mean I don't have to get a license either? Oops.
Jethro!
Sui Juris Freeman
 
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 5:23 pm
Has thanked: 226 time
Have thanks: 200 time

Next

Return to Travel

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

suspicion-preferred